Boris Cherny 的反思拿到今日最高互动(7226 赞):「我一直在想一件事:过去,我认识的最好的工程师花大量时间用各种方式自动化自己的工作。更好的 vim/emacs 自动化……」——这条线索的核心论点是 AI 编程 agent 是最好的工程师一直在做的事的自然延伸。最快采纳 AI 的工程师,正是那些已经在构建自动化工具的人。
Thariq 的提示词哲学(2754 赞、248 转发):「理想的提示词技术是:薄 prompt、厚 artifact + 上下文、薄 skill。」这浓缩了从冗长提示词到提供丰富上下文、让模型做重活的转变。后续推文:「软件工程就是自动化的职业」(1619 赞)。
Steipete 论 PR 审查(572 赞):「如果我为一个不熟悉的 iOS 代码库提交 PR,审查者因为没用对框架而拒绝……」——论证 AI 生成的代码应该适用同样的标准。他还发现某个东西「真的很聪明」(1534 赞),以及「5.6 是无情的」(201 赞)。
Boris Cherny:我一直在想一件事:过去,我认识的最好的工程师花大量时间用各种方式自动化自己的工作。更好的 vim/emacs 自动化……
Thariq:理想的提示词技术是:薄 prompt / 厚 artifact + 上下文 / 薄 skill。
Thariq:软件工程就是自动化的职业。
Peter Steinberger:如果我为一个不熟悉的 iOS 代码库提交 PR,审查者因为没用对框架而拒绝……
Peter Steinberger:真的很聪明。
Peter Steinberger:基本属实,5.6 是无情的。
Boris Cherny's reflection got today's highest engagement (7226 likes): 'Something I have been thinking about: in the past, the best engineers I knew spent a lot of time automating their work in various ways. Better vim/emacs automation...' — the thread argues that AI coding agents are the natural extension of something the best engineers have always done. The engineers who adopt AI fastest are the ones who were already building automation tooling.
Thariq's prompting philosophy (2754 likes, 248 retweets): 'ideal prompting technique is: thin prompts, thick artifacts + context, thin skills.' This distills the shift from verbose prompting to providing rich context and letting the model do the heavy lifting. His follow-up: 'software engineering is the profession of automation' (1619 likes).
Steipete on PR review (572 likes): 'If I put up a PR for an iOS codebase I don't know and a code reviewer rejects it because it doesn't use the right framework, or if a designer builds a new feature...' — making the case that the same standards should apply to AI-generated code. He also found 'This is really clever' (1534 likes) and noted '5.6 is relentless' (201 likes).
Boris Cherny: Something I have been thinking about: in the past, the best engineers I knew spent a lot of time automating their work in various ways. Better vim/emacs automation...
Thariq: ideal prompting technique is: thin prompts / thick artifacts + context / thin skills
Thariq: software engineering is the profession of automation
Peter Steinberger: If I put up a PR for an iOS codebase I don't know and a code reviewer rejects it because it doesn't use the right framework...
Peter Steinberger: This is really clever.
Peter Steinberger: Mostly true, 5.6 is relentless.